Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -94
3/17/2025, 5:54:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
US Education Department Contractor Overcharged Taxpayers While Spending Millions On Executive Salaries

As student math and reading scores declined, the American Institute of Research charged 50% in indirect costs and paid its CEO over $2 million

by @galexybrane and…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
There's no proof of major waste, fraud, or abuse in govt spending, say the media. But there is. And now Public has obtained invoices revealing that a major contractor overcharged the Ed. Dept, paid its CEO $2M/year, and promoted debunked research as student performance declined.

The statement and accompanying images contribute to public discourse by addressing concerns about government spending and accountability. The receipts are presented as evidence to support claims of overcharging and high executive salaries by a contractor for the US Education Department. This engages with public issues of financial transparency and educational outcomes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight potential financial mismanagement, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for responsible use of taxpayer money. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks, though it does mention executive salaries. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By providing evidence, the statement seeks to promote understanding and accountability in government spending. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by presenting evidence to support its claims, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]