Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement reports on a situation involving US-funded international networks and their response to a Trump administration order, suggesting a potential legal and ethical conflict. It addresses public issues related to governance, media freedom, and the rule of law, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it reports on actions taken by media networks in response to a government order.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by informing the public about a significant issue involving media freedom and governance. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it focuses on the actions and decisions of organizations. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on this issue, the statement uses influence to inform the public about potential overreach or unlawful actions by the government, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on media networks' defiance of a government order, highlighting issues of media freedom and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.