Rashida Tlaib

Rank 5 of 47
|
Score 180

The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely the conflict between Israel and Palestine, and uses strong language to describe the actions of the Israeli government. It calls for international actions such as sanctions and an arms embargo, indicating a call to action on a public policy issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses charged language like 'genocide' and 'apartheid regime,' which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than promoting peace. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be interpreted as contributing to hate speech against a nation or group, which violates the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory and inflammatory language without fostering dialogue or understanding. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong accusations without providing a platform for discussion or understanding of differing perspectives. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to call for international actions, which could be seen as using influence for societal change, but the inflammatory language undermines this effort. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement exercises free speech, the use of charged language and lack of responsible dialogue does not uphold the principle of using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [-1]