Michael Schellenberger

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -88

The statement accuses Trump advisors of knowingly engaging in unconstitutional actions, which is a serious allegation. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting a strong disagreement with the actions of the advisors. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to constitutional law and governance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement potentially causes harm by making a broad accusation without providing evidence, which could damage reputations. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, as it makes a public accusation without substantiation. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote constructive dialogue, as it uses a blanket accusation rather than engaging in a reasoned discussion. [-2]