Michael Schellenberger

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -85
3/18/2025, 6:44:44 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” — James Madison, The Federalist No. 47, 1788
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
🤡
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
This is Kamala-level word salad and whataboutism by @StephenM . He knows better which means he's gaslighting.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
If the Trump administration continues with these obviously unconstitutional actions, then it will lose the legitimacy, public support, and power it needs to pursue free speech diplomacy, which would be a very disappointing outcome @SecRubio @marcorubio
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
326d
President Donald Trump is weaponizing the Justice Department to persecute his political enemies, say the media. “Trump calls for jailing his perceived opponents in Justice Department speech,” reported NBC. “The president intends to bend the vast powers of federal law enforcement…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
It's up to the courts not the Administration to determine whether it is non-justiciable. The administration must comply with the order until a higher court reverses it or sets it aside. That's how our system works.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
324d
WATCH IN FULL: White House Deputy Chief of Staff @StephenM schools Fake News CNN's @kasie on the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.

The statement and its context involve a discussion on the legality and constitutionality of presidential actions, specifically regarding deportations and the use of the Alien Enemy Act. It critiques the administration's actions and the role of the judiciary, touching on themes of separation of powers and rule of law.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to critique government actions, potentially highlighting harm caused by bypassing legal processes. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The discourse respects privacy but includes strong language that could be seen as disrespectful or accusatory. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding of legal and constitutional issues, though it may lack empathy in its tone.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of government actions, which is constructive, but includes personal attacks and accusations of gaslighting. [-1]