Jake Tapper

The statement addresses the ongoing conflict involving Hamas, touching on themes of destruction, survival, and the refusal to surrender. It critiques Hamas's decision-making, suggesting it is driven by an unwillingness to face failure rather than strategic considerations. The tone is critical and somber, focusing on the human cost of the conflict.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement highlights the harm caused by the conflict, implicitly urging for a resolution. It does not directly incite harm but critiques the continuation of conflict. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement attempts to evoke empathy by highlighting the suffering of survivors and the destruction of the city, although it is critical of Hamas's actions. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement critiques Hamas's refusal to surrender, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]