Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses the removal of a story about Jackie Robinson from the Department of Defense website, expressing disapproval and calling for its restoration. It engages with public discourse by discussing the preservation of historical narratives and the recognition of American heroes.
- The statement uses strong language ('ghouls') which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, violating the principle of doing no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of 'ghouls' could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and recognition of Jackie Robinson's contributions, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using a confrontational tone ('should be ashamed').Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the recognition of historical figures, aligning with the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could use a more responsible tone to maintain integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.