Reposted by Bret Baier
Roger Sollenberger
@SollenbergerRC
·
66d
The statement raises a question about the implications of a settlement involving the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, which is a public issue related to international relations and energy policy. It seeks clarification on the matter, indicating an engagement with public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, simply seeking information.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the specifics of a settlement, encouraging further discussion and clarity. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly questioning and seeking information on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.