The statement reports on a legal decision involving Greenpeace and its protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, which is a matter of public interest. It highlights the financial implications for Greenpeace and the claims made by Energy Transfer.
- The statement is factual and does not appear to cause harm directly, but the underlying issue involves significant financial harm to Greenpeace.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on the organizations involved rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks and presents the information in a straightforward manner. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement informs the public about a significant legal and environmental issue, contributing to public awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.