Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -95
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Over the last two and a half years, the two of us, @shellenberger and @galexybrane, have written and published hundreds of articles and testified before Congress on multiple occasions about the clear violations of the spirit and letter of the Constitution by former President Joe…
3/19/2025, 10:05:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
324d
WATCH IN FULL: White House Deputy Chief of Staff @StephenM schools Fake News CNN's @kasie on the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.

The statement and conversation involve a discussion on constitutional issues related to actions by political figures, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on alleged constitutional violations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses advisors of unconstitutional actions, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation involves public figures, so privacy concerns are minimal, but the tone could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations. [-1]