Tricia McLaughlin
@TriciaOhio
·
322d
The statement questions the legal basis for the Department of Homeland Security's actions against an individual, suggesting a focus on legal and civil rights issues. It engages with public discourse by addressing potential governmental overreach and the implications of political views on immigration status.
- The statement itself does not cause harm but questions potential harm caused by governmental actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the legal basis of actions, encouraging a discussion on civil rights. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue by questioning the legal justification, rather than attacking individuals involved. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning governmental actions and using the platform to discuss civil rights. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.