In reply to:
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
@AndrewYang
·
79d
The statement is a satirical response to a discussion about the potential consequences of a government shutdown, highlighting the impracticality of private fundraising to support federal employees during such an event.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses sarcasm to make a point, which could be seen as dismissive of the serious implications of a shutdown.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses sarcasm, which may not foster constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to make a point, but the sarcastic tone may not be the most responsible or constructive use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.