Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement engages with a public issue concerning the deportation of foreign students based on their political activities, touching on First Amendment rights and immigration policies. The tone is provocative, suggesting a broad desire for deportation but questioning its legality under free speech protections.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies a willingness to deport broadly, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech but discusses a controversial topic that could impact the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it expresses a desire to deport many individuals. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and lacks a reasoned argument, focusing instead on a provocative stance. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement questions the legality of deportation under the First Amendment, showing some awareness of free speech principles, but does not use this platform to responsibly address the issue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.