The statement addresses a public issue involving national security and immigration policies. It clarifies the reason for the French researcher's denial of entry, emphasizing a violation of a non-disclosure agreement and refuting claims of political bias.
- The statement aims to clarify the situation and prevent misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not disclosing the researcher's identity, but it does discuss his actions publicly.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement refutes claims of political bias, which could be seen as engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.