Reposted by Jake Tapper š¦
The statement discusses Gavin Newsom's recent podcast where he expresses opposition to certain progressive cultural issues, contrasting with his previous support for them. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with societal issues and public policy debates.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to divisive discourse by highlighting a perceived inconsistency in Newsom's positions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public policy positions rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on political inconsistency rather than fostering dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Newsom's policy reversals but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implies that Newsom has not acknowledged or corrected his past positions, highlighting a potential lack of accountability.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about a political figure's changing positions, which can contribute to public awareness and accountability.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing public policy issues and uses its platform to inform the public responsibly.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.