Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement addresses the issue of the 'abundance agenda' and its potential politicization, emphasizing that it should be a non-partisan solution to challenges faced by governors and mayors. The tone is concerned and aims to promote a more inclusive approach to public policy.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the issue rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting that the abundance agenda should be a universal solution rather than a partisan one, fostering a sense of unity. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the risk of politicization without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for a non-partisan approach to public policy, which could contribute to societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing a public issue and encouraging a broader perspective. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.