Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a conversation that involves a public issue, specifically concerning civil rights in the U.S. The initial comment by @GaryMarcus suggests a serious concern about the state of civil rights, which is a substantive public issue. The subsequent replies by @rula_awad and the final reply with the shocked emoji 😱 indicate a reaction to this concern, though they do not add substantive content to the discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm but rather expresses shock or concern, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The use of emojis suggests an emotional reaction but does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a simple expression of shock without further discussion.
4. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses the platform to react to a public issue, but it does not substantively contribute to the discourse.