In reply to:
ian bremmer
@ianbremmer
·
58d
The statement is a critique of Columbia University's decision to change policies in response to the loss of federal funding, suggesting that the university's endowment should have been used as a financial buffer. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, implying that the university prioritized financial concerns over principles.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of Columbia University's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of the university's decision, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique a public issue, maintaining a focus on the university's policy decisions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.