Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about civil rights and government actions in the U.S. It reflects a tone of alarm and urgency, suggesting that current policies and actions threaten individual freedoms and legal norms.
- The statement uses strong language that could incite fear or anxiety, potentially causing harm by spreading panic, which slightly violates the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, thus upholding the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on fear and alarm rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue, focusing instead on a one-sided view.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible, as it could contribute to misinformation or fear without providing evidence or context. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.