Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 87

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to civil rights, immigration policies, and governmental actions, particularly in the context of the U.S. It critiques the denial of entry to a European scientist and the deportation of a Lebanese doctor, suggesting these actions are unjust and indicative of broader systemic issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('This is fucked up') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, but it is primarily directed at policies rather than individuals. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, focusing criticism on policies rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting perceived injustices in immigration policies. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by responding to previous comments, though it uses a confrontational tone ('Read the news, Dan'). [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about civil rights and immigration issues, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to critique government actions, using the platform responsibly to discuss public concerns. [+1]