Reposted by Marianne Williamson
The statement addresses the historical and ongoing issue of Agent Orange cleanup in Vietnam, framing it as a matter of restitution rather than charity. It highlights the diplomatic relationship between the U.S. and Vietnam, suggesting that the cleanup efforts are crucial for maintaining positive relations. The linked article discusses the potential public health and diplomatic consequences of halting the cleanup program, which is a significant public issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights the potential harm of halting the cleanup, aligning with the principle by advocating for continued efforts to prevent harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the historical responsibility of the U.S. and the importance of the cleanup for Vietnamese citizens. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the importance of the cleanup program, the statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society, particularly in terms of public health and international relations. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing a significant public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.