In reply to:
Rumspringa Cosmonaut
@MR34962842
·
27d
The statement is a reply in a conversation about absolutism and a single ruler's control over speech, which touches on public issues related to governance and freedom of expression. The tone appears to be critical of the idea of a single ruler determining speech, suggesting a concern for free speech and democratic principles.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a critique of a concept rather than a personal attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in dialogue about a public issue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by critiquing the idea of absolutism in speech control. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.