The statement addresses the importance of maintaining a collective stance against yielding to certain pressures, likely in a legal or academic context. It suggests a call to action for law firms and universities to remain steadfast, which implies engagement with public issues related to institutional integrity and societal standards.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a defensive stance against potential negative outcomes.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks elements of promoting understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on resistance. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not encourage dialogue or constructive criticism either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage a collective stance, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by maintaining standards. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for a collective consensus, using the platform to express a strong opinion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.