Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement and related conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the constitutionality of a legal provision used for deportation, touching on issues of free speech and executive authority. The tone is informative and critical, aiming to highlight a legal and constitutional issue.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on legal and constitutional analysis rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by discussing the implications of deportation on free speech rights. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses its platform to advocate for the protection of free speech and constitutional rights. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.