In reply to:
Blake Cohen
@TheFeralJew
·
116d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
117d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of academic freedom and the potential consequences of government intervention in university policies, particularly in relation to protecting Jewish students. The tone is concerned and critical, focusing on the implications of such actions on antisemitism and academic freedom.
- The statement strives to do no harm by highlighting potential negative consequences of certain actions, such as increased antisemitism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on policy implications rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by discussing the broader implications of government actions on academic freedom and antisemitism. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment with a reasoned argument rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing the impact of government actions on academic freedom. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.