Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 16

The statement uses sarcasm to address controversial topics such as animal consumption, gender reassignment, abortion, economic issues, and societal values. It appears to mock or criticize perceived changes or misconceptions in societal norms.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by trivializing serious issues and spreading misinformation. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals affected by these issues, potentially engaging in harmful rhetoric. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, using sarcasm rather than promoting constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism and may provoke rather than facilitate meaningful discussion. [-2]