Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -95

The statement critiques the Democratic Party's political strategy and suggests a shift towards nationalism as a reason for potential long-term dominance by the Right. It references a book on nationalism, indicating a broader ideological debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but could contribute to divisive rhetoric by framing political success in terms of nationalism versus globalism. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards differing political views, focusing instead on ideological victory. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in critique but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions, focusing on blame and prediction. [-1]