Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses concerns about the potential risks associated with a leak by Jeffrey Goldberg, specifically focusing on military operations and the implications for national security. It critiques the handling of sensitive information and suggests that self-censorship was necessary to prevent compromising top-secret plans.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm to military operations and personnel, suggesting an awareness of the importance of safeguarding sensitive information. This aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a focus on the issue at hand without attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement presents a critique of the leak and its handling, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. However, it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the implications of a leak on national security, which is a matter of public concern. It uses the platform to discuss the importance of responsible handling of sensitive information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.