Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the security of government communications and the implications of using encrypted apps, which are relevant to public policy and national security concerns. The tone is inquisitive and critical, questioning the practices of government officials in comparison to military personnel.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it raises legitimate concerns about communication security. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning and analyzing the security practices of government communications. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the practices of government officials without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight potential security issues, contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for secure communication practices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly questioning government practices and encouraging dialogue on public security issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.