Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement criticizes the Secretary of Defense's response to a situation involving leaked war plans, suggesting that it undermines national security and emboldens enemies. It also dismisses a journalist as deceitful and discredited, which could be seen as an ad hominem attack.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting national security is compromised, which could incite fear or concern. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement disrespects the journalist's dignity by labeling them deceitful and discredited. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in an ad hominem attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.