Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement is a critique of a public official's actions, suggesting misconduct and calling for an investigation. It implies a serious accusation of corruption and urges accountability from another public official.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words, but it implies serious accusations without providing evidence, which could be harmful if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of public officials without presenting evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it makes accusations without engaging in a reasoned argument or providing evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for accountability, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but it lacks substantiation.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does not provide evidence or a balanced argument, which may not fully uphold responsible use of the platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.