Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
DOD Rapid Response
@DODResponse
·
26d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the credibility of a journalist and the accuracy of a report, which are public issues. The tone is dismissive and critical, focusing on the perceived inadequacies of the journalist and the subject's response.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the subject's response as 'pathetic whining,' which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in name-calling and dismissive language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses personal attacks rather than engaging with the content of the report. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.