Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
DOD Rapid Response
@DODResponse
·
27d
The statement and conversation involve a critique of a journalist and a broader commentary on honor in the country, engaging with public issues and media credibility.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, reducing the potential for constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement discredits a journalist, which may not respect their dignity and could be seen as a form of harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue, as it involves a personal attack on the journalist. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.