Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
Brian Stelter
@brianstelter
·
28d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it comments on a public issue involving the Trump administration and a journalist. The tone is supportive of Jeffrey Goldberg's actions, described as 'patriotic' by another user. The statement acknowledges a change in the speaker's usual stance, indicating a positive shift in opinion.
- The statement does not cause harm and supports a positive action, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By agreeing with a positive characterization of Goldberg's actions, the statement promotes understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging a change in opinion without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.