Jake Tapper

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 79
3/25/2025, 3:19:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Jake Tapper 🦅
@jaketapper
·
39d
@EWErickson: "To his immense credit, Atlantic Editor Jeffrey Goldberg behaved like a patriot. He did not compromise the names of CIA agents or important details related to the means and methods of an attack on the Houthis and he did not expose the matter until it was concluded."

The statement calls for accountability in a situation where a significant error occurred, suggesting that higher-level individuals should face consequences similar to those faced by junior-level individuals. It implies a critique of the current handling of the situation, potentially related to national security or intelligence matters, as inferred from the context of the conversation and the linked article.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but calls for accountability, which can be seen as a neutral stance in terms of harm.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting a perceived double standard in accountability without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By advocating for accountability, the statement uses influence to promote a fairer system, which can be seen as contributing to societal betterment. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing a public issue without compromising sensitive information. [+1]