The statement appears to engage in a public issue by criticizing a group, particularly an individual named Waltz, for their approach to a discussion. The tone is critical and suggests that the group is not handling the facts appropriately.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it does criticize a group and an individual, which could be seen as indirectly harmful if not done constructively. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence to support its claims, and it borders on a personal attack by singling out an individual. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.