Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 84
3/26/2025, 5:47:51 PM
X
In reply to:
sofia
@AffineTyped
·
49d
@GaryMarcus To be fair, there's a healthy debate going on in the community note proposals about how exactly to draft the note.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
49d
Blatant lie; no community note. 3.5 Million views

This site is total garbage.
Karoline Leavitt
@PressSec
·
49d
The Atlantic has conceded: these were NOT “war plans.”

This entire story was another hoax written by a Trump-hater who is well-known for his sensationalist spin.

The statement is part of a conversation about the credibility of a news story and the ensuing public debate. It reflects skepticism about the process of drafting a community note, implying that the issue has gained significant attention (3.5 million views).

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses skepticism about the process.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech but questions the integrity of the process.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather expresses doubt. [-1]