Marianne Williamson

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 133
3/27/2025, 10:41:40 AM
X
In reply to:
CLaur
@CandicefromMe
·
25d
@marwilliamson This is how we felt the last 4 years with people pouring over our borders unvetted. We have children and want them safe. What’s happening now is course correction. We’ve lived through the trauma.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
25d
For those of you who can't sleep -- who have cried over this, panicked over it, or are generally feeling traumatized by what's happening in this country, remember:

Abolitionists had no reason to believe they could bring down a system so powerful and wealthy as slavery.

Women

The statement is part of a public discourse on immigration and public safety, engaging in a debate about the impact of immigration policies on children's safety.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement questions the safety of children in the context of current events, which could be seen as a concern for doing no harm, but it does not explicitly promote harm or safety.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it challenges another user's perspective, which is a normal part of public discourse.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it questions the other user's belief without offering an empathetic perspective. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by questioning another user's perspective, which is a form of constructive criticism, but it does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]