Andrew Yang

The statement questions the competence of a national security adviser by suggesting a mix-up in a sensitive situation, potentially leading to a security breach. It uses a speculative and somewhat sarcastic tone, implying negligence or error in handling classified information.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified information about a serious security issue. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, as it speculates on their actions without evidence. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on blame and speculation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It does not engage in constructive criticism, as it relies on speculation and sarcasm rather than factual analysis. [-1]