Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement expresses strong criticism of the actions taken by ICE agents in arresting an international student, comparing it to historical authoritarian practices. The tone is one of outrage and condemnation, aiming to highlight perceived injustices in immigration enforcement.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly the comparison to 'Gestapo-like conduct,' which may not promote a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the student by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as indirectly contributing to a hostile environment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on condemnation rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a historical comparison that may shut down conversation rather than encourage it. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to draw attention to a societal issue, potentially contributing to public awareness and debate about immigration enforcement practices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its inflammatory comparison. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.