Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 132

The statement and linked article discuss a public issue involving an executive order by President Trump targeting funding for programs at the Smithsonian Institution based on their ideological content. This is a substantive engagement with public policy and its implications for freedom of expression and cultural institutions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, but the executive order it discusses could potentially harm the diversity of narratives in cultural institutions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public figures and institutions rather than individuals.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement and conversation express concern over freedom and control, which can promote understanding and empathy regarding the importance of diverse narratives. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the executive order and its implications, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to raise awareness about potential threats to freedom of expression and cultural diversity, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by discussing the implications of the executive order and using the platform to responsibly critique it. [+1]