Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
·
36d
The statement discusses the FBI's handling of internal investigations and the Hunter Biden laptop issue, suggesting misconduct and lack of transparency. It implies criticism of the FBI's actions and decisions, touching on public trust and accountability in government institutions.
- The statement may cause harm by potentially spreading unverified claims or fostering distrust in public institutions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not disclosing personal information but may impact the dignity of those involved by implying misconduct. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and may contribute to polarization rather than understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to question government actions, which can be seen as promoting accountability but lacks a balanced perspective.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.