Michael Schellenberger

The statement and conversation involve discussions about media and social media strategies regarding potential disinformation campaigns, specifically focusing on the origins of hacked materials rather than their content. This touches on issues of media ethics, influence, and transparency, which are relevant to public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement suggests a focus on the origins of information rather than content, which could be seen as an attempt to prevent harm by avoiding the spread of potentially misleading information. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   There is an implication of coordination between media and social media companies, which raises questions about transparency and respect for public trust. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The intent to focus on the origins of information could promote understanding of disinformation tactics, but it may also obscure important content.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but suggests a coordinated effort that could be seen as undermining open dialogue. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The involvement of influential organizations and individuals suggests a significant impact on public discourse, raising questions about the responsible use of influence. [-1]