Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -85
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
33d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
33d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
33d

The statement discusses the FBI's influence on media and social media platforms regarding the Hunter Biden laptop story, suggesting a coordinated effort to manage public perception. It implies a lack of transparency and potential manipulation of information, raising concerns about journalistic ethics and freedom of speech.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement suggests harm through manipulation of information, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It raises concerns about privacy and dignity, implying a breach of ethical standards in media coordination. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the FBI and media practices, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to accountability, but lacks direct engagement with opposing views.
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight potential misuse of influence by powerful entities, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    It touches on free speech issues, suggesting that the FBI's actions may have compromised this principle. [-1]