Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 97
4/2/2025, 1:23:44 PM
X
In reply to:
PolitiQuips
@Politi_Quips
·
3d
@marwilliamson Grok counter argument:

While Marianne Williamson’s post rightly points out that digital intelligence cannot replicate the physical and emotional depth of human interactions like hugging or making love, it overlooks the ways in which technology can enhance, support, and even
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
3d
Digital intelligence cannot caress. It cannot hug a child. It cannot make love. It cannot laugh. It has no heart. 1/2

The statement is a supportive reply to a conversation about the limitations of digital intelligence compared to human interactions. It does not engage substantively with the public issue being discussed, as it merely expresses agreement without adding further analysis or argument.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is supportive, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by agreeing with a point made in the conversation, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, aligning with the principle. [+1]