In reply to:
Scott Alexander Ballingall
@TheRedFisher1
·
43d
@marwilliamson We are going to place the future in the hands of an upgraded Encyclopedia Britannica.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
43d
The statement is part of a conversation that touches on the role of digital intelligence in society, which can be considered a public issue. The tone is somewhat sarcastic, suggesting skepticism about relying on digital intelligence for future societal needs.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, maintaining a neutral tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of critique but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to express skepticism about digital intelligence, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.