Andrew Yang

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 111

The statement appears to be a sarcastic comment on Eric Adams, possibly in relation to a political or electoral situation. It implies a negative outcome for Adams and suggests a connection to Trump, likely as a critique or mockery. The tone is dismissive and sarcastic, which may not contribute constructively to public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm and mockery, which can be seen as harmful, especially if it undermines the dignity of the individuals mentioned. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved by using sarcasm and mockery. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a sarcastic remark that could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]