Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/3/2025, 11:45:11 AM
X
In reply to:
John Hawkins
@john_c_hawkins
·
315d
@GaryMarcus This is a fun take. But I am not it has always been true.

I think the more we have learned and built AI systems the clearer it became how inadequate the Turing test is.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
316d
The Turing Test is a sort of inverse IQ test.

The more seriously you take it, the less intelligent you are.

The statement is part of a conversation about the relevance of the Turing Test in the context of AI development. It engages with a public issue related to the evaluation of AI systems, which is a topic of public interest and debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it is a neutral comment on the historical context of a paper.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to the discussion by acknowledging the historical context of the Turing Test.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a historical perspective without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]