Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes OpenAI's transition to a for-profit model, suggesting it betrays its original mission and commitments. It calls for public support of a legislative bill, indicating engagement with public policy and societal issues.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy issue, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting concerns about corporate integrity and public trust. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI's actions without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for legislative change, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to address a public issue, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.