Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement accuses a public figure of illegal activity and suggests a failure in the justice system. It implies guilt by association and criticizes the removal of a video as an admission of guilt.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement potentially causes harm by making serious accusations without evidence, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual involved, as it publicly accuses them of a crime. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive dialogue and engages in personal attacks, violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [-2]